The Hiring Algorithm Is Shared. The Lawsuit May Not Be.
Job applicants say one AI platform screened them out across many employers. Class certification will test whether shared software creates a shared legal claim.
Read the analysisAttorney-led analysis of courts, AI, legal technology, clients, professional responsibility, and the operating decisions that determine what happens next.
Job applicants say one AI platform screened them out across many employers. Class certification will test whether shared software creates a shared legal claim.
Read the analysis →Current analysis, case and regulatory explainers, documented legal stories, and selective operating guidance for modern firms.
CMS canceled policies covering more than 760,000 people and paused new broker registrations. The legal question is what each signal proves, and what happens when it is wrong.
Read article →New breach litigation against Greenberg Traurig raises a broader problem for law firms: forensic reports do not become privileged merely because counsel commissioned them.
Read article →Law schools are banning devices while requiring AI instruction. The apparent contradiction reveals a deeper question: which legal skill is actually being assessed?
Read article →Congress has advanced bills to restore the $7.5 million Subchapter V debt limit. The pending change would alter which distressed businesses can use streamlined Chapter 11.
Read article →The First Circuit held that DHS cannot use a final removal order to bypass effective notice and a meaningful chance to raise fear claims about a new destination.
Read article →The Ninth Circuit held that Kalshi sports contracts are likely gaming on tribal lands when the user buys there. Online platforms do not make location legally irrelevant.
Read article →The Associated Press is challenging a federal rule that keeps most immigration-case filings off PACER. The lawsuit asks whether courthouse-only access is meaningful public access.
Read article →A federal judge found intentional destruction of FEMA-related Signal messages and barred hindsight denials. The case shows why disappearing evidence changes the legal record.
Read article →A trustee says one required bank report could have exposed Mitchell Kossoff's theft years earlier. The lawsuit tests what client-protection systems are for.
Read article →The largest nationwide study of lawyer well-being reports widespread burnout and distress. The harder question is whether legal employers will change how work is assigned, supervised, and rewarded.
Read article →DOJ is reportedly examining Nvidia's Groq arrangement. The hard question is not what the documents call it, but whether technology, talent, and competitive capacity moved together.
Read article →A new fund backed by more than 50 general counsel could improve legal technology. It also collapses the distance between investor, adviser, buyer, and endorser.
Read article →Two people earned ABA-accredited law degrees in prison. Minnesota's bar process must now decide what their work proves, without erasing their crimes or their change.
Read article →A federal judge removed Quinn Emanuel from a defamation case despite one lawyer's limited prior role. Conflicts are about protected knowledge and loyalty, not time entries.
Read article →A federal court blocked EPA from relabeling California emissions waivers for Congressional Review Act repeal. The ruling is about process, power, and legal consequences.
Read article →DOJ's new immigration-reporting opinion expands the agencies it says must report. Its treatment of knowledge raises a separate question about evidence and error.
Read article →The September 1 Sality announcement marks an enforcement success, not proof of clean systems. Why remediation, evidence, and client disclosure remain separate tasks.
Read article →Sony and Warner's new Anthropic lawsuit separates acquisition, training, outputs, and copyright metadata. A fair-use defense must address the actual conduct.
Read article →Proposed federal rules would reverse the default against electronic filing by self-represented litigants, but local restrictions and digital barriers still matter.
Read article →KKR says outside law firms will reimburse its record HSR penalty. The disclosure exposes how regulatory advice can become balance-sheet risk for counsel.
Read article →A federal court ordered USCIS to resume normal adjudication for a certified class, recognizing that an indefinite hold is government action.
Read article →A federal court held that the Pentagon could reject Anthropic, but could not turn an AI contract dispute into an unsupported national-security designation.
Read article →Meta's proposed teen-safety settlement does more than restrict Facebook and Instagram. Its conditional payments and stricter second phase are designed to pull rival platforms toward the same rules.
Read article →Law firm revenue is surging, but inventories are rising and collection cycles are slowing. The gap between work recorded and cash collected may be the most important number in the business.
Read article →The Fifth Circuit is considering whether AI-related errors justify sending a Mississippi civil-rights case to a new judge. The issue is not simply accuracy. It is whether correction can restore confidence in the process that produced the order.
Read article →The FTC's proposed personalized-pricing policy targets undisclosed use of personal data, but disclosure alone may not restore a market in which consumers can meaningfully compare prices.
Read article →New Illinois lawsuits argue that AI training did more than copy recorded speech. The systems allegedly extracted voiceprints, forcing courts to decide when content becomes biometric data.
Read article →The Education Department has recommended ending federal recognition of the ABA's law-school accreditor. The real issue is how accreditation quietly controls money, mobility, and entry to the profession.
Read article →Microsoft's new legal-engineer role shows how AI is creating a second market for legal expertise and changing the economics of a legal career.
Read article →A California appellate court sanctioned a lawyer after AI-generated quotations entered a brief despite a paralegal verification protocol. The decision draws an important line between cite-checking and professional judgment.
Read article →On September 18, USCIS will apply a new public-charge framework and accept only the revised Form I-485. The transition is a substantive legal change and an operational deadline at the same time.
Read article →The Fourth Circuit upheld a narrow injunction limiting immigration enforcement at certain houses of worship. Its most important conclusion is that predictable fear can damage an institution before an arrest ever occurs.
Read article →Minnesota banned AI tools that can create realistic nude images of identifiable people. xAI says the law violates the First Amendment. The harder question is whether a state may regulate a capability before the abuse spreads.
Read article →Illinois's new HB 5487 targets management-services organizations and indirect investor control. The real dispute is over who governs the machinery surrounding legal judgment.
Read article →The Supreme Court's new immigration habeas case asks whether prevailing detainees may seek attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The statutory question is narrow. Its consequences are not.
Read article →Artificial intelligence is moving from answering questions to taking actions. The law may soon discover that its traditional theories of responsibility were built for a world in which humans remained firmly in the loop.
Read article →A Connecticut sanctions order involving hidden instructions in a court filing shows why briefs, exhibits, discovery, and client uploads must now be treated as both legal material and untrusted computer input.
Read article →Online booking removes friction, but an open calendar can create unqualified consultations, attorney interruptions, and client confusion. Here is how to design the scheduling decision.
Read article →Why law firms should replace exhaustive first-contact forms with progressive intake that improves completion, privacy, conflicts control, and review quality.
Read article →A practical framework for law firm intake compensation that rewards qualified outcomes, accurate records, client treatment, and sound escalation instead of pressure.
Read article →A practical framework for interviewing prospective law firm clients without confusing pressure, imperfect recall, or uncertainty with a bad case.
Read article →How law firms should govern automated intake follow-up with evidence of consent, channel limits, effective opt-outs, suppression controls, and human review.
Read article →How law firms should design voice-AI intake for relay calls, communication disabilities, text alternatives, human escalation, and equivalent outcomes.
Read article →A practical scorecard for measuring completed intakes, qualified next steps, handoffs, exceptions, conversion, and collected contribution.
Read article →A practical framework for deciding how long a law firm should retain AI intake recordings, transcripts, summaries, and vendor copies.
Read article →A practical framework for deciding when a law firm should transfer an intake call, schedule a consultation, send an urgent alert, or take a structured message.
Read article →Why declined legal matters require a controlled intake process for conflicts, confidentiality, caller expectations, referrals, and documentation.
Read article →A practical framework for auditing AI legal intake after launch, scoring real calls, responding to failures, and controlling workflow changes.
Read article →Why unanswered law firm calls become lost revenue, why receptionists cannot solve a capacity problem alone, and where AI intake can help.
Read article →A practical boundary for AI-assisted legal intake: five decisions that require attorney judgment, supervision, and accountability.
Read article →A more defensible way to calculate missed-call opportunity for law firms without inflated averages or false precision.
Read article →Why immediate law firm response matters, what should happen in the first five minutes, and how to design a reliable intake path without overpromising.
Read article →A practical analysis of the handoffs between inquiry, intake, consultation, engagement, matter opening, communication, and billing.
Read article →How law firms should evaluate AI intake as operating infrastructure, including capacity, data quality, unit economics, and implementation sequence.
Read article →Use the intake guide, audit checklist, script template, ROI model, and responsible-AI framework to apply the analysis inside your firm.
Open the legal intake library →Call the live line, interrupt it, change direction, or switch to Spanish. Evaluate the workflow, not a polished recording.